VP Advice for Obama

I was reading a VP discussion over at Ezra Klein's American Prospect blog and a commenter named "Mike B" made a very astute point about the prospect of choosing Sen. Evan Bayh as veep:

I think the veep choice is going to be a signal for how Obama feels about his own chances. If it's Bayh--the safest, blandest, least interesting choice possible, and someone who isn't a natural fit with his message or style--he's terrified that the race doesn't favor him. It's the kind of dumb decision made out of fear instead of rationality, and it's at the root of the problems that have been screwing up our party for decades.

I think this is exactly right.  To be sure, as the pundits and political junkies discuss Barack Obama's VP options, I just wanted to offer some (unsolicited) advice to the junior senator from Illinois: Trust your instincts.

What I mean by this is that Obama should choose the person who he believes in and who he personally feels would make a good leader for this country--and then let the chips fall where they may.  If this person is from a state with only a few electoral college votes, or a state that is guaranteed to go to the Republicans in the fall, or both, it doesn't matter.  

Picking someone like Sen. Bayh as VP would send a clear message to voters that Obama is doing all of this to get himself into the White House, not to effect any real or meaningful change.  It would be a purely cynical move and I think voters would sense this.

Obama should instead choose someone who would enable him to send this signal to the voters: "I believe in my message and I have a good argument to make.  My running-mate reinforces this argument and that's why I think he/she would make a great leader if something were to happen to me."  This is what motivates people to get out and vote.

Let's use someone like Gov. Brian Schweitzer of Montana as an example.  Since he is from a state with only 3 electoral college votes that is almost certain to go to McCain in November, choosing him would send a message to the voters that this choice was made not because Obama hoped he could carry a particular state, but because he actually believes in Schweitzer's leadership abilities.  I think voters would definitely sense this, and Obama's message of change would be strengthened and reinforced.

Anyway, I've made my case and I'm going to open it up to commenters: Agree?  Disagree?  Am I reading too much into the VP decision?  To quote Bill O'Reilly: What say you?


Poll
What criteria should Obama use in selecting a veep?
Go with the person you feel best reinforces your core strengths, electoral machinations be damned.
Be cynical. Play to win.

Votes: 12
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Re: VP Advice for Obama (2.00 / 1)

So what do you all think?


by Will Graham on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:43:03 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Ideologically - and assuming the shortlist we hear about is accurate - I'd probably take Clinton.

From a state-level tactical standpoint, I'd take Bayh - he can help win Indiana.  Beyond a darkhorse like Schweitzer (who won't get picked), I don't think there's any VP candidate with a better real chance to flip a state.  He magnifies Obama's midwest flavor.  He's also, unfortunately, probably at the bottom of my ideological list.

Biden can be a hell of an attack dog, but also has a real foot-in-mouth problem.

If Bill Richardson weren't such a sloppy campaigner - sloppy to the point of honestly being a ticket hindrance, I think - I'd probably prefer Richardson.   I don't buy the "too ethnic" BS - no one with 'concerns' about ethnicity is going to say "Well, I was gonna vote Obama - but then he chose a latino as his #2".

I think Clinton would be a strong VP to play the attack dog role - she's a fine campaigner, very disciplined.

I think there are problems with Kaine - I don't see him really helping in VA (he doesn't help in the western part of the state, near as I can tell).  He's got questionable pro-choice bona fides.

Ultimately?

I'd probably flip a coin between Bayh and Clinton.  I think I'd tactically lean Bayh, but politically prefer Clinton.


by zonk on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 11:23:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If Bayh would make him look weak, (none / 0)

Hillary would make him look very weak, but that's a whole other discussion we have had on here many times before.  

I think it's an interesting and worthy point the diary author is raising, although I disagree with it.  I think that Obama does not have this election in the bag, and a bad VP choice could hurt him.  He has to think strategically.

I think he will have to choose somebody from inside the Clinton sphere of influence, but not the Clintons.  Why?  Not to assuage the angry Clinton dead-enders, of whom I really don't think there are that many that are persuadable.  Obama needs to worry about the party functionaries and parts of the party machine that are used to being loyal to the Clintons and may fear that they are going to be kicked to the curb.  He needs to reassure them with a failiar face from within their own circle.  

Bayh would fill that role to a tee, but, yeah, but for that, he's a very disappointing figure.  For one thing, the "elitist" charge might not stick to Obama, but Bayh reeks of elitism.  

A better choice, I thought, was Wesley Clark, but we haven't heard much about that lately.


by Dumbo on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 02:59:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (2.00 / 1)

Shweitzer would be a great choice - so would Jon Tester.

I wouldn't cede Montana's EVs to McCain just yet.


by alamedadem on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:45:57 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

The poll won't let me pick both options!


by QTG on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:50:44 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Mark Warner would be the ultimate VP pick for Obama.


by mbcarl on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:54:33 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Obama won't lose on points.

America will either trust him or they won't.

Hillary and Bill are the strongest defense he has.

Hillary for VP and attack Dog will cover what he needs covering.


by dtaylor2 on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:59:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (2.00 / 1)

I think these are the dog days of the campaign, everyone is staring at their navels, over-reacting to stupid ads with Paris Hilton...

And, obsessing over the VP choice.

I'm less worried about risky vs safe vs what it says about Obama's thinking. I tend to distrust anyone that says they can read something deeper into a very complex decision and state they know what it means (thank you Dr. Freud).

I'm just hoping for someone with some spark, or an interesting story, Even Bayh seems SOOOOOOO bland to me.

Wes or Hillary, please.


"Either you're the butcher Or the lamb but even so, Everybody pays as they go-Jakob Dylan"
by WashStateBlue on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:54:44 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

I have a question. If for example Obama has decided on Clinton would he have told her by now?
I'm leaning towards no.
by Politicalslave on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:03:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Good question.

Maybe they are STILL infighting in the Obama camp, and Barack hasn't decided to stop it yet.

If he is going for "the team of rivals" concept, perhaps watching HIS team going at it is educational?

He also might be watching the Clintons to see how the are working, so far, Hillary seems to be really on message, Bill STILL seems a little off.
(Wow, watch DTaylor or someone else jump me now!)

Hell, I don't have a clue, and I really believe no one here and the media does either.

I just think a safe boring Pol like Bayh is so deadly dull...Kaine is not much better, but at least his life story is a bit more interesting.

I just can't get off how strong a Obama/Clark or Obama/Clinton ticket would be, I can't see McCain come close to matching that horse power?

Obama/Clinton vs McCain/Romney.

Wow, what a mismatch.


"Either you're the butcher Or the lamb but even so, Everybody pays as they go-Jakob Dylan"
by WashStateBlue on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:09:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

I would still say Wes Clark is a better choice than Hillary.


http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 09:14:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

I am not sure Hillary would be the best person to tell a secret like that to. It would be all over her face every time she got asked about whether she wanted it.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:45:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm sure the Clintons know they are excluded. (none / 0)

If they weren't, you wouldn't have seen Bill Clinton make such awful remarks the other day.  If they thought they were still in the running, they would have kept quiet not to jinx things.

That's one reason I find all the Hillary as veep speculation so ridiculous.


by Dumbo on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 03:02:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Senator Obama has stated he will not choose a VP to win a particular state. I believe he will send a message by choosing his rival Senator Clinton.
Look for a "Team of Rivals" and effective theatre.
(Within 5 days of "Hillary Night")
by Politicalslave on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:57:25 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 11:39:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

ignore the blank post.

what i intended to say was that people are really misapplying the "team of rivals" concept.

First, none of the "rivals" on Lincoln's "team" were the VP. The "team of rivals" idea involves just that--a TEAM. It's not just about the president and vice president, but rather the Cabinet, which is where Lincoln placed Chase, Seward, et al. Lincoln kept them close, but not THAT close.


by Johnny Gentle Famous Crooner on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 11:46:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm a big Schweitzer fan too... (none / 0)

but there is no iota of an inkling of a whisper of a piece of a tea leaf that Schweitzer is in the mix.  Plus, he started advertising for his own reelection campaign this week in Montana.  They may have concluded that he is too green for the national scene.  

Sigh. People like Schweitzer and Mark Warner are big parts of the future of this party.

McCain is smart to wait until Obama picks.  If Obama goes outside Washington (which I agree he should do and think he will do), McCain can go experience (probably Romney) and they will pound "the most inexperienced team ever seeking the Presidency" meme.  If Obama goes inside Washington, McCain can pick someone new on the national scene (say Pawlenty).

Or vice versa. :)


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:17:51 PM EST

Re: I'm a big Schweitzer fan too... (2.00 / 1)

I agree that it appears McCain has the advantage by choosing his VP last.  But if it looks like he is picking someone purely as a reaction to Obama, that might make him less appealing to voters.  Doesn't exactly show leadership, know what I mean?


by Will Graham on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:29:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm a big Schweitzer fan too... (none / 0)

Romney has 4 incompetent years as Mass Governor.  They try to do your Meme and they will be crucified.  Romney is a joke... if McCain picks him, that will end this election right there.


http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 09:17:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

hmmm - not sure i agree. (2.00 / 1)

It would be a purely cynical move and I think voters would sense this.

yes - i agree that the VP pick will be v. telling for a number of reasons including the one you mention.  but politics is cynical will - the sooner the some realize it the better.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:52:33 PM EST

Re: hmmm - not sure i agree. (2.00 / 2)

"but politics is cynical will - the sooner the some realize it the better."

I wish I could tell you you are wrong...But politics is just way to cynical to deny it.


by SocialDem on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 12:58:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

I have a feeling it's going to be a surprise.


* Hums Mr. Rogers theme *
by Maori on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 10:05:53 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

I think all this talk of VP being "Obama's personal, private decision" is nonsense.  

Obama is representing all Democrats, and after being beside myself after two Bush wins, I want a winning combination.

If Obama/Clinton helps us to steamroll back into the White House, then that's what it has to be.

I just don't see the benefit of gambling with a B-lister.

- Matt


by mjc888 on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 10:17:54 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (2.00 / 1)

"I think all this talk of VP being "Obama's personal, private decision" is nonsense."

I think that comment is nonsense. Obama can not be perceived to be choosing his VP because of arm twisting. The media and the Rethugs will portray him as weak. In essence it is his "personal, private decision" because this is the person who Obama is going to be working with for the next 8 years. He needs someone whom he can work with and use that person's knoweledge(sp) to his advantage. If that person is Clinton than so be it. But to act as if he shouldn't pick someone that suits his interests and someone whom he feels comfortable with is wrong.  


by SocialDem on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 12:56:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly (2.00 / 1)

Obama can not be perceived to be choosing his VP because of arm twisting. The media and the Rethugs will portray him as weak.


by Dumbo on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 03:07:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (2.00 / 1)

Anyone other than Hillary would be a disaster. She deserves it, damn it, and this is coming from an Obama supporter. She's Machiavelli with ovaries.....both of which the party sorely needs to win


"Let them eat cake"
by NCDEM29 on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 11:04:31 PM EST

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Hillary would be a disaster -- if she's somehow idiotically chosen, expect to hear a thousand millions clips of her saying how Obama hasn't passed the CiC threshold.

Anyone would be better than Hillary. Anyone at all. She doesn't "deserve" anything other than the fair chance everyone else also got, and frankly "Machiavelli with ovaries" isn't the most complimenting expression.


by Aris Katsaris2 on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 07:45:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

..your all emotion and no substance..


"Let them eat cake"
by NCDEM29 on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 01:11:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: VP Advice for Obama (none / 0)

Seemed to me there was plenty of substance there. I agree with some of it. While I think that Hillary has a lot of strengths as VP, the fact is that they'd be showing clips of her saying Obama isn't qualified to be president 24/7, and that would hurt.


by Cincinnatus on Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 01:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.